![]() ![]() There is no support in MacPorts for daemons to be loaded on demand. These options were designed before the existence of launchd and don't provide a way to handle all of launchd's functionality. Ports that want to provide launchd plists generally are advised to do so using the startupitem options. ![]() I guess the ticket tracking the need to expose more of launchd's functionality in portfiles is: Is this a problem on the macports side that needs to be addressed, or It should be possible to write a LaunchDaemon plist file suitableįor daemons that could be launched by inetd (on other systems) in Things may need it, given how launchd has different expectationsįrom other system's approaches to starting daemons, and someĭaemons may not have a sufficiently compliant behavior withoutĭaemondo as an intermediary. I've had issues before with the whole daemondo wrapper bit. The format is that of a simple key/value space or tab separated pair. Lines beginning with are comments, empty lines are ignored. This file is read by the port command and determines how it behaves. Sudo launchctl load -w /Library/LaunchDaemons/ nf is the configuration file used to bootstrap the MacPorts system. Sudo launchctl unload -w /Library/LaunchDaemons/ Sh-3.2$ cat /Library/LaunchDaemons/Īfter putting the file in place, one would have to e.g. Here's what I have on an older system - I haven't tested it recently or on something newer, nor am I volunteering anything other than information, which may or may not be all wrong. But IMO, where daemondo is unnecessary, a plist without it should be supplied in MacPorts, so that it has the right name for port load / port unload to work, and so that one doesn't have to replace the plist with one of the same name (which would get clobbered on an update of the port).įor that reason, I have my alternate plist under a different name, so that I just have to keep the MacPort-supplied one disabled. You can do it yourself, in which case you need to unload the MacPorts-supplied wrapper. To install fgsl, paste this in macOS terminal after installing MacPorts. I'm wondering if that's why the port is already in use. Is the first one supposed to be running, or should daemondo start it 06:55:16.072468 -0700 defaultĐ6:55:16.072468 -0700 rsync unable to bind any inbound sockets on port 873Ģ1693 ? Ss 0:00.00 /opt/local/bin/rsync -daemon -config=/opt/local/etc/nfĢ3272 ? Ss 0:00.01 /opt/local/bin/daemondo -label=rsyncd -start-cmd /opt/local/etc/LaunchDaemons//rsyncd.wrapper start -stop-cmd /opt/local/etc/LaunchDaemons//rsyncd.wrapper stop -restart-cmd /opt/local/etc/LaunchDaemons//rsyncd.wrapper restart -pid=fileauto -pidfile /opt/local/var/run/rsyncd.pid ![]() The same goes for a macport upgrade to 2.3. Sudo launchctl debug system/ -stdout -stderr Error: Insufficient privileges to write to MacPorts install prefix. ![]() That means the rsyncd process exited with an error. Most often, care is taken to only exclude non-recent data (e.g., packages or distfiles for older versions of ports) or data destined for deprecated .launchd (): Service exited with abnormal code: 2 South Korea, Kingdom, Kingdom, Hosted Onlineĭue to size constraints, this location might not mirror all content, but selectively delete data or choose not to mirror it. The URL used to get Portfiles is set in $/etc/macports/nf. Portfiles are normally retrieved with port sync or port selfupdate. If you would like to provide a new mirror of MacPorts content, please see Mirroring. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |